From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 14:43:29 +0200 Message-ID: <83ilwf2iku.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <87tug4fdn7.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmqsp0m7.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0gzyy8k.fsf@gnus.org> <835ysjoupv.fsf@gnu.org> <8735nnyob1.fsf@gnus.org> <83y25fneeh.fsf@gnu.org> <87pmqrx7rh.fsf@gnus.org> <83tug3ndaj.fsf@gnu.org> <874k81vmlf.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfvl8wjw.fsf@gnu.org> <87o869y0v2.fsf@gnus.org> <83fsrl8owz.fsf@gnu.org> <87o869wkcx.fsf@gnus.org> <83bl298n9b.fsf@gnu.org> <8735nlwih6.fsf@gnus.org> <837dcx8kkn.fsf@gnu.org> <87czmofl3z.fsf@gnus.org> <83ee745ppw.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl28cnrj.fsf@gnus.org> <83zgps46f3.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtlr9kv0.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40682"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 13:48:42 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mqaeg-000APf-5Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:48:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52096 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqaef-0006iS-8u for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:48:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45294) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqaZn-0001oB-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:43:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=45406 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqaZa-0007r7-9m; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:43:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=eEfq2potAWFn9qS4Mh7SoK2e/cslNHH/YbWBx0l+Fas=; b=HMO4iFaSn8Q8 fBmj0NJkoZFZ/zaktk/ooecaTP82ugwSvAWRBhws13crCkx5C1AO5CMhpfY+U8Pm7t9hSsZ3Ar3ZT uFRN1P1n6Hckz0yUBD4hZCfoBzruZEw1qRWrdrMSkQ/qZcodGarQgd09hddSWrnW4t+p7X8C24s87 U0IzSri+5lwaMphOosJ8Pn1dXsrZZ0q35bYSD0L9vjlcC3Z6t5dGahX/2MLShmC8gPM8FEn7A3Y3E MXy7jPsR0gP0eX7kON0nCe94niJxQfDUD4foAwlx4MiOlsMuCKP2H54FY09uh7aM+t8/Wq0AmEAHo b3dcdKDP2wHgMV1lKii0cQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2162 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mqaZY-0000i2-VQ; Fri, 26 Nov 2021 07:43:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87mtlr9kv0.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:12:19 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280235 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: dgutov@yandex.ru, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 13:12:19 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > The padding of a string should not depend on whether there's another > > string after it. The padding is a display feature: if some Lisp puts > > the property on a string, that string should look the same, with the > > same padding, regardless of where on the screen it is located, and > > regardless of whether there's some text after it. > > It does look the same, I think? That is, nothingness that comes from a > stretch looks like the same like the nothingness that was there before. > > (But you can tell the difference in buffers if you put the point after > it.) Exactly. So no, it does NOT look the same.