From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suppressing native compilation (short and long term) Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2022 19:02:56 +0300 Message-ID: <83ill21adr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bkqxf1ij.fsf@tethera.net> <8335c9dkyf.fsf@gnu.org> <83tu4odez7.fsf@gnu.org> <871qrrpkgx.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <834jwnbi6c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtafnun5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83sfk6ahty.fsf@gnu.org> <83czbaafnj.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15909"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 02 18:03:46 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1of1RS-0003vi-K0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 18:03:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60298 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of1RR-0006VP-Ed for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of1Qp-0005XW-R5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54472) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of1Qo-0002Ho-WF; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:03:07 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=KLqVoPAo3tC3mK5wpswaRp7z+KLNWegahLP35b77Asc=; b=cpAOgpnPRIXn i0N0W0GJs8m4K2gqzquoIsYYjlzCw7mLv2xOHmxdRlDDqhQ3l7Xx5SS3U0VM0Li+74sjc/8enWaU1 7H0ogzIaFPPGSKdjY9xmRcqgDHWbQPaq/J8CvYJhlYY5fVox631RDXF+qymYgV/vQQkQEQ4oRVU8X UZvBe71vKRwzK5M7ivL6LjgGBzX56XhXfVwWTNO5MZtKzXRRXtbtdr1Kx6ptUImYPBqhxmjwCCbxJ ThxHzdIRxGLySa59A8fOe7DHo1qvi3DWG2yxO8WsUD0/2QBD8RThsrb/RUhQrMpnbsnFbDA87fvEB jrqbZH3duAia7gKy8rdxKA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3004 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1of1Qo-0005O4-5u; Sun, 02 Oct 2022 12:03:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: (tomas@tuxteam.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296630 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 17:54:44 +0200 > From: tomas@tuxteam.de > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > But installing a binary pacage on a system does modify the system > > > for all users, so admin powers do make sense there. > > > > What do you mean by "binary package" in this context? I believe > > "package" in this discussion generally alludes to Lisp packages, from > > ELPA and elsewhere. They aren't "binary" in my book. > > Ah, I see. I was too sloppy. I was talking about Debian packages. That still doesn't explain it to me (I don't use Debian). Can you elaborate what kind of packages are we talking about, in the context of this discussion?