From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Android port of Emacs Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 16:45:27 +0300 Message-ID: <83il9nhuyw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83v8fnslfz.fsf@gnu.org> <121acd3282a64abf77d6@heytings.org> <215b00d2595bec215977@heytings.org> <215b00d2598ab5cc7d0a@heytings.org> <489f350ce63391ec8d49@heytings.org> <3283828c9732e5f433ab@heytings.org> <87edkbjafk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28477"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eric S Fraga Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 10 15:45:35 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qU5yo-0007DQ-IZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 15:45:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qU5yJ-0004zT-Cl; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:45:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qU5yI-0004z7-0R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:45:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qU5yH-0005Tn-4s; Thu, 10 Aug 2023 09:45:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=EfdRUFVF6HnXjDCFzBPwiVJxfHKwPRekM9fuJHfZN1E=; b=pE9W7Y7kxz6o imR0iHqOYFT4Ks9TtpSDFeKcfNJ/J5EcP0URAUNvS9B3tgd/dqh1airHG1u0vpbGSrPswpb2gGtUp RpD/+OqT/AHJUIKjSzU0TV+HV8j/bw03PSSgBGCPIv2VKZiASILu9aA+A9qeBXJwPB3PAIPwt3Y1b RtqFUfLRaIyO8U37hx8Et7t5CyHbts0GEdJC/np1OZbHXGr8/iobanKbYNlSClpK9z4eFC9XxhfSc 5m5qQj9bwQt9Ozo8++lnpRT4pDHcHS3qm5isEozDQRm4GyHgfCRTz1XN4obJ1/oLCJbiOd1FkcA+p SWSsrayXzrCZf+yNKgM9/A==; In-Reply-To: <87edkbjafk.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (message from Eric S Fraga on Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:26:07 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308533 Archived-At: > From: Eric S Fraga > Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 14:26:07 +0100 > > On Thursday, 10 Aug 2023 at 11:28, Gregory Heytings wrote: > > I'm the only one who protested, so I guess I'm the only one to think > > that. > > You're not alone. And, more generally, I rely on Emacs via termux daily > (on a mobile device that has a physical keyboard) and I don't > particularly find anything missing that the native port will give me, > but that's me and my particular use case (portable org mode basically). > Not that I'm against a native port. I don't understand the need for reviving this old thread. The feature branch was landed on master, so the Android build is now supported, and barring any catastrophes, will be released with Emacs 30. It is futile to keep arguing about this, so would people please stop?