From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Strange message from "bzr pull" Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 21:01:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83hbr9eha3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877hs5ogv8.fsf@red-bean.com> <83my11ejmr.fsf@gnu.org> <87aax1mxh6.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262113186 5518 80.91.229.12 (29 Dec 2009 18:59:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 29 19:59:18 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NPhHp-00078N-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 19:59:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50108 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhHp-0000Do-SP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:59:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhHj-0000DK-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:59:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhHe-00008H-0n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:59:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60207 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NPhHd-000082-RN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:53021) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPhHd-0003Go-Bl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KVF00700GNOKU00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:59:02 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.222.44]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KVF0065OGQCVS40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 29 Dec 2009 20:59:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87aax1mxh6.fsf@red-bean.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118959 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 13:44:21 -0500 > Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >So does that mean there's a bug in bzr? If not, then what are > >tree-less repositories good for? > > The answer to that is "many thing", I think, just not things we happen > to be doing here. OK. So, since we have this tree in trunk/, what are the reasons to keep it pristine, again? IOW, why not make quick and simple fixes in it directly, instead of in another branch?