From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:52:36 +0200 Message-ID: <83hbf795rv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> <83r5eb995g.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4k3976k.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290543139 16008 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 20:12:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 21:12:14 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKzDk-0006ZM-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:12:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42031 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKzDj-0005dx-CP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:12:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59456 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKyt2-0003zy-Mh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:50:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyt0-0003wJ-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:50:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:58556) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKyt0-0003vl-MP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:50:42 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LCC00C00S7J1500@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:50:35 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.9.106]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LCC008IZSG8XNN0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:50:34 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133077 Archived-At: > From: Lennart Borgman > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:28:33 +0100 > Cc: sean.sieger@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:22 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote= : > >> From: Lennart Borgman > >> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:39:41 +0100 > >> Cc: Sean Sieger , emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> > >> >> =C2=A0- Releases should or should not include debug info? > >> > > >> > It is IMO slightly better to ship the release without debug in= fo. > >> > >> Why not ship to versions of the release binaries, with and witho= ut debug info? > > > > Because it's pointless. =C2=A0If we want to give users release bi= naries > > with debug info, we should just ship such a binary, period. >=20 > Please explain why you think that. I just did, above.