From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No sources for lisp/international/uni-*.el? Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:29:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83hb5qzjqa.fsf@gnu.org> References: <18822.41538.150077.451125@a1ihome1.kph.uni-mainz.de> <18822.52229.644385.706466@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20030.54198.935820.969776@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20031.31400.99411.903245@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <87fwlcnwvg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E40DD50.8050002@online.de> <874o1rko6q.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <4E40EDF5.8030901@online.de> <4E4100E4.3090705@online.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312903784 22999 80.91.229.12 (9 Aug 2011 15:29:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 15:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?WINDOWS-1255?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 09 17:29:40 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqoFP-0005PD-VA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 17:29:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50312 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqoFP-0000WX-Ae for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:29:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58215) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqoFM-0000WE-K2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:29:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqoFK-0002lJ-96 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:29:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QqoFK-0002l7-2c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:29:34 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LPO00J002Y9WB00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:29:33 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.94.185]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LPO00JX8317G9N0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:29:33 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <4E4100E4.3090705@online.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143061 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:41:56 +0200 > From: Andreas R=F6hler > CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > Am 09.08.2011 10:45, schrieb Eli Zaretskii: > >> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:21:09 +0200 > >> From: Andreas R=F6hler > >> > >> > >>> I apologize to the other list members for the tone in this mail= . > >>> > >> > >> which pretty good illustrates my concern > > > > Tone aside, your repeated attacks on the GPL >=20 > Hi Eli, >=20 > even if my contributions are modest, it should be clear I'm a suppo= rter=20 > of free software. BTW published several stuff under GPL. That's besides the point in this case. > I'm far from attacking. Then perhaps your wording needs to be revised, because any time related issues come up, your messages are explicitly negative. > OTOH should I hide concern if envisaging danger, which might destro= y the=20 > whole project still, if not faced? This is not the place to express those concerns, that's all I'm saying. There are other forums for that. Why you insist talking about this here is beyond me.