From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Windows 64 port Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:18:28 +0200 Message-ID: <83hay6b1a3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20120219211800.0000558f@unknown> <834numv7js.fsf@gnu.org> <83ty2ltep0.fsf@gnu.org> <4F4EEBC2.5070704@cs.ucla.edu> <4F4F3A1A.4020808@cs.ucla.edu> <83ty27bbmn.fsf@gnu.org> <4F512F1A.7080806@cs.ucla.edu> <83k432bqu7.fsf@gnu.org> <4F51AF59.3000100@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330759141 30727 80.91.229.3 (3 Mar 2012 07:19:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fabrice.popineau@supelec.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org, ajmr@ilovetortilladepatatas.com To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 03 08:19:00 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S3jF6-0002Ds-2e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:19:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40006 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3jF5-0005ew-8c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:18:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3jF2-0005ep-FO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:18:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3jEg-0002Or-QS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:18:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:39397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S3jEg-0002M1-Ie for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:18:34 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M0A00800S7EYI00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:18:31 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.42.18]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M0A008YTSASYG00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:18:31 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <4F51AF59.3000100@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148880 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:42:49 -0800 > From: Paul Eggert > CC: fabrice.popineau@supelec.fr, ajmr@ilovetortilladepatatas.com, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > The way I see it, Fabrice is trying > > to contribute, and you discourage him on false pretenses. > > A good way to react to a critical and honest code review is > to thank the reviewer, make changes that seem warranted, > and move on, which is what Fabrice is doing. This is > standard practice in software engineering. Unsupported and > incorrect accusations of bad faith are not helpful in this > process, as they tend to discourage people from reviewing > and thereby improving the code. Thank you, but your reviews are heavily biased, and expressed in a form that discourages the contributors. Please in the future try improving your style of reviewing patches, in particular when they come from users of tools and systems you happen to dislike very much.