From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Anyone building Emacs trunk with MinGW w64 (32 bits) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:03:59 +0200 Message-ID: <83hajxxd5c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zjxumbjf.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83vc8f1t0x.fsf@gnu.org> <87sj3jcr6t.fsf@wanadoo.es> <86zjxrs4jm.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3ovcn1r.fsf@wanadoo.es> <86fvzj2gkz.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj3jaqfs.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83y5dazmpt.fsf@gnu.org> <86ehf2zefk.fsf@gmail.com> <86li9az2sw.fsf@gmail.com> <83hajyz1mi.fsf@gnu.org> <867gku88lx.fsf@gmail.com> <83a9pqysc5.fsf@gnu.org> <86sj3i6ndd.fsf@gmail.com> <83620eyonh.fsf@gnu.org> <86620dqmsd.fsf@gmail.com> <83r4j1xmim.fsf@gnu.org> <86y5d9p4oh.fsf@gmail.com> <83ppylxidt.fsf@gnu.org> <86txnxoz1k.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1364385836 16710 80.91.229.3 (27 Mar 2013 12:03:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:03:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rzl24ozi@gmail.com, Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 27 13:04:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UKp5W-0006OM-Ov for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 13:04:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55640 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKp58-00070z-Ms for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:03:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKp54-0006yO-Tj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:03:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKp50-0004bf-23 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:59742) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UKp4z-0004bP-RB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 08:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MKB00C00INCYX00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:03:43 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MKB00CUEIU7PZ70@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:03:43 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <86txnxoz1k.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158290 Archived-At: > From: rzl24ozi@gmail.com > Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 20:35:51 +0900 > > The remained warnings in my environment are below, it is same > with/without --no-opt. > The last two may be my environment problem. > > > w32.c:177:0: warning: "FSCTL_GET_REPARSE_POINT" redefined [enabled by default] > c:\usr\local\strawberry-perl-5.16.3.1-32bit-portable\c\bin\../lib/gcc/i686-w64-mingw32/4.6.3/../../../../i686-w64-mingw32/include/winioctl.h:1270:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition > > w32proc.c:45:20: warning: 'IsValidLocale' redeclared without dllimport attribute: previous dllimport ignored [-Wattributes] These two should be fixed in trunk revision 112156. > gnutls.c:117:1: warning: 'gnutls_connection_end_t' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations] Ted, could you please look into this? > image.c: In function 'my_png_error': > image.c:5482:1: warning: 'noreturn' function does return [enabled by default] I don't see anything wrong with the code; could be a compiler bug. Thanks.