From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (heap 1024 82721 1933216) Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:17:51 +0200 Message-ID: <83ha91jjk0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52DA8412.2080009@dancol.org> <83lhydjt6d.fsf@gnu.org> <52DA86DE.3000401@dancol.org> <83k3dxjsd2.fsf@gnu.org> <52DA8BE1.5090702@dancol.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390065506 744 80.91.229.3 (18 Jan 2014 17:18:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 18 18:18:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4ZXT-0001qR-70 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 18:18:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43779 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4ZXS-0007nP-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:18:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4ZXK-0007n8-Kj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:18:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4ZXF-00029U-7n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:18:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:61863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4ZXE-00029O-UH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 12:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZL00500WU3JW00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:17:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZL005T4XDOFV50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:17:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <52DA8BE1.5090702@dancol.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168697 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 06:12:49 -0800 > From: Daniel Colascione > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > there's still 2GB of accounted memory sitting there unused. You are using your system's malloc, right? If so, how is this something Emacs can fix? When your system's malloc relinquishes memory to the OS is that malloc's internal business. As is heap fragmentation, for that matter.