From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: One more string functions change Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:48:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83ha3364rh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <53AD8D59.5000207@yandex.ru> <53AD9FDB.80705@cs.ucla.edu> <83simq6spc.fsf@gnu.org> <53AEEBA3.1030706@yandex.ru> <83zjgx54ub.fsf@gnu.org> <53AF7FB9.1030709@yandex.ru> <83r427696f.fsf@gnu.org> <53B04102.6060803@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404060551 8136 80.91.229.3 (29 Jun 2014 16:49:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 16:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Antipov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 29 18:48:59 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X1IHh-0007vx-PV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 18:48:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58323 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1IHh-0004Ep-Dv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1IHZ-0004EQ-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:48:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1IHU-0008QU-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:48:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:35306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1IHT-0008Q6-W1; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N7X00G00VIZUF00@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:44:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N7X00H3TVUH6010@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Sun, 29 Jun 2014 19:44:41 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <53B04102.6060803@yandex.ru> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172816 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 20:38:26 +0400 > From: Dmitry Antipov > CC: handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On 06/29/2014 07:13 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > It's possible that we should consider this now, but the answer to your > > question is not a trivial one in any case. Emacs traditionally > > exposed to Lisp all the Unicode character properties, as char-tables. > > Are these exposed properties really used from Lisp in a high-level, > user-defined manner? For example, is it desirable/possible to customize > related things via .emacs? Or is there major/minor mode which relies > on the Lisp-visible character properties? These are exactly the questions we should ask ourselves. I don't know the answers off-hand, and I don't think these issues were discussed in the past.