From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix conv_lisp_to_sockaddr for AF_INET6 addresses Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:04:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83h9hjqgk7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87egco56s6.fsf@gnus.org> <83io1zri30.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3gnhmu1.fsf@gnus.org> <87mvrbhmkm.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454952254 23961 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2016 17:24:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 17:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 08 18:24:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aSpXj-0005mu-EN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:24:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47096 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSpXi-000241-Fc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:24:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44214) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSpFE-0005lm-VR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:05:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSpFA-0007DP-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:05:00 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:32821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aSpFA-0007DK-Mt; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:04:56 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1478 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aSpFA-0006GE-1F; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 12:04:56 -0500 In-reply-to: <87mvrbhmkm.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:07:21 +1100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199537 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:07:21 +1100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > > > But I'll test [openssl] out and see whether it's usable for our purposes. > > Hey, that was amazingly easy to use. :-) Is it possible to use gnutls-serv instead, or at least as an option? You require Emacs to be compiled with GnuTLS, so I think the probability of having gnutls-serv installed is higher than having openssl, certainly on non-Posix hosts. Besides, openssl is less friendly to the GNU project, both legally and otherwise. Please?