From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About the 'minibuffer' frame parameter Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:33:02 +0300 Message-ID: <83h9azl4s1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <579E3F9E.8020200@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470404071 5601 195.159.176.226 (5 Aug 2016 13:34:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 05 15:34:23 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bVfGG-0006kt-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 15:34:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45410 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVfGC-0005ry-Va for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42204) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVfFg-0005nk-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVfFc-0000rs-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:33:27 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bVfFc-0000rk-CG; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:33:24 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1093 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bVfFZ-0002mS-Ei; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 09:33:24 -0400 In-reply-to: <579E3F9E.8020200@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:12:46 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206424 Archived-At: > Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 20:12:46 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > > I'm not sure how to deal with this situation. Personally, I'd prefer to > report the real, internal 'minibuffer' parameter but am afraid that > might break existing code. You mean, you think there's some code out there that expects to receive nil in that case? Do we have any code in our tree that might expect that? > In any case, the documentation should be fixed. Somehow. Before fixing the docs we should decide what the code should do. Thanks.