From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native line numbers landed on master Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 05:29:50 +0300 Message-ID: <83h8yjiu3l.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k23jl5ra.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2xqo8p7.fsf@lylat> <83lgnxk7v6.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499740209 19074 195.159.176.226 (11 Jul 2017 02:30:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 02:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: agrambot@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 11 04:30:01 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUkw3-0004SN-Lc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 04:29:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUkw8-0000mR-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:30:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUkw3-0000mB-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUkvz-0004AI-Gz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUkvz-0004AD-EZ; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:29:55 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4634 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dUkvy-00087d-Jf; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 22:29:55 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from John Wiegley on Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:19:18 -0700) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216454 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Alex , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 15:19:18 -0700 > > >>>>> "EZ" == Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> Why did you choose the name line-number-display-width over, e.g., > >> display-line-number-width? It seems every other related variable has a > >> prefix of display-. > > EZ> Not every other one: the faces start with line-number. > > If the defgroup is display-line-numbers, shouldn't all customization options > use that prefix? They should, and they do, AFAICT.