From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: xr Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 17:14:40 +0200 Message-ID: <83h8dbn09r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831s4lsz89.fsf@gnu.org> <834l9fsm0h.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftsyrbna.fsf@gnu.org> <83tvhdo089.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="136745"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 16:15:37 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsqpU-000ZMh-Br for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 16:15:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60494 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsqpT-0005mm-8q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:15:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsqow-0005mY-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsqow-00075N-Cf; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3740 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gsqoq-0001qe-89; Sun, 10 Feb 2019 10:14:56 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Richard Stallman on Sun, 10 Feb 2019 00:51:58 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233188 Archived-At: > From: Richard Stallman > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2019 00:51:58 -0500 > > > I know, but what I don't understand is how ERC etc. are different from > > a package stored on ELPA. > > I did not say they are different. My understanding is that we treat ALL > the packages in ELPA as part of Emacs. But for packages we add to Emacs, and place into the Emacs Git repository, we didn't until now request any statement from the author, we assumed that being in the repository is a clear sign that the package is part of Emacs. We also assumed that being in the ELPA repository is a clear sign of the same. Now it sounds like we were mistaken?