From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs i18n Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:45:05 +0200 Message-ID: <83h8cc8gy6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o97aq6gz.fsf@jidanni.org> <871s3p0zdz.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h8ckezyt.fsf@gnu.org> <83o96qegv1.fsf@gnu.org> <32b1ab1b-bef4-629a-8830-b1dcc6915087@cs.ucla.edu> <83a7iae9va.fsf@gnu.org> <05ed2dec-2a84-f7dc-1af5-c9d923992785@cs.ucla.edu> <87bm2p56gu.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <838sxrdgco.fsf@gnu.org> <83mum6bv11.fsf@gnu.org> <87zhq6nwsi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <8336nxbxfi.fsf@gnu.org> <2539FAB2-2D71-44F5-B8D9-2C4AFE52ACEC@gmail.com> <83wol986to.fsf@gnu.org> <75275F9B-D257-4C9E-85A0-A7F57C93FD64@gmail.com> <83mum48s9t.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef7gbg08.fsf@gmx.de> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="9375"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: brandelune@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 09 11:45:58 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ZUM-0002KU-HZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 11:45:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57162 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ZUL-0002M5-JE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 05:45:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43642) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ZTk-0002Kg-FW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 05:45:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56540) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ZTk-0003Ez-3I; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 05:45:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4875 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h2ZTj-0005nB-Ie; Sat, 09 Mar 2019 05:45:19 -0500 In-reply-to: <87ef7gbg08.fsf@gmx.de> (message from Michael Albinus on Sat, 09 Mar 2019 09:37:11 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:233957 Archived-At: > From: Michael Albinus > Cc: Jean-Christophe Helary , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2019 09:37:11 +0100 > > > If you are following the discussion, you know that not everyone agrees > > with that. There are advantages in having just one catalog or a small > > number of large ones. > > One catalog for the whole Emacs is not appropriate for packages with a > life outside Emacs core, like org or Tramp. Yes, but the question still stands whether those packages which _are_ maintained only in the Emacs repository should have one catalog or more than one, and if more than one, then at which granularity.