From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:04:03 +0300
Message-ID: <83h88lqzgc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <m34l4rkoti.fsf@gnus.org> <87tvcq9b0w.fsf@igel.home>
 <E1hcL65-00067A-Pf@fencepost.gnu.org> <p917e9ltobo.fsf@google.com>
 <jwvsgs9w5vk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <p9136k9szoh.fsf@google.com>
 <jwvo92wuyra.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <E1hcu7L-0001BL-SF@fencepost.gnu.org>
 <jwva7egaxxa.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <ac9a16e9-3bc8-633e-0f72-9aafc632c690@cs.ucla.edu>
 <jwv7e9ju8lw.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83v9x2svmf.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwva7ee93hy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83fto6sphn.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwv36k67l4p.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <83sgs5r20q.fsf@gnu.org>
 <jwv4l4l35qx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226";
	logging-data="159800"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org"
Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 19:25:59 2019
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hdeLO-000fRS-V2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:25:59 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40694 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1hdeLN-0000w6-LK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:25:57 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41076)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1hde1B-0004hl-3O
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:05:07 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41947)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hde10-0001xe-BU; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:04:57 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1094 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1hde0O-0007e2-Cb; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:04:17 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwv4l4l35qx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
 Monnier on Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:19 -0400)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237923
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/237923>

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu,  rms@gnu.org,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:19 -0400
> 
> For the others, I believe the expectation is that it's common to use only
> a small part of those files (like a handful of functions from CL or one
> particular command from dired-aux), which is the most favorable
> situation for byte-compile-dynamic.

Makes sense, thanks.