From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: On elisp running native - Update 8
Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 19:21:59 +0300
Message-ID: <83h7wfdf4o.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <xjf4kyo1ofh.fsf@sdf.org> <83tv5mp48l.fsf@gnu.org>
 <xjffth0iyhm.fsf@sdf.org> <83sgl0lchm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <xjfsgl0ea8p.fsf@sdf.org> <83imlwl9vm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <xjfpng3cprd.fsf@sdf.org> <jwvlfqrp6dl.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <xjfblrm5bcu.fsf@sdf.org> <xjf5zhit77o.fsf@sdf.org>
 <xjf8sliiobw.fsf@sdf.org> <83o8uegykm.fsf@gnu.org>
 <xjf4kw6gpsl.fsf@sdf.org>
 <74dd94a9-28cb-a5fd-dbc7-ab21009834ad@cs.ucla.edu>
 <xjfv9omf63p.fsf@sdf.org> <xjfo8ude3vq.fsf@sdf.org>
 <jwvd0at2jxp.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <xjfftfc9p0q.fsf@sdf.org>
 <xjfzhdi8kh2.fsf@sdf.org> <xjf7dzzsymt.fsf@sdf.org>
 <xjftv2e69e4.fsf_-_@sdf.org> <xjfo8qndhta.fsf_-_@sdf.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202";
	logging-data="14097"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 16 18:23:04 2020
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZzaa-0003VG-AM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 18:23:04 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55236 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jZzaZ-0001LS-CM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:23:03 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42168)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1jZzZm-0000Yq-4u
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:22:14 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44188)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZzZk-0002pa-Ep; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:22:12 -0400
Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1334 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1jZzZh-0001gh-Ht; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:22:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <xjfo8qndhta.fsf_-_@sdf.org> (message from Andrea Corallo on Sat, 
 16 May 2020 15:24:01 +0000)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:250503
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/250503>

> From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 15:24:01 +0000
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
>  Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> 
> https://akrl.sdf.org/gccemacs.html
> 
> Please follow up with comments, suggestions on missing features or
> observations so we can prioritize correctly to work in the direction of
> making it mergeable.  I value any comment or maintainer's indication on
> that.

FWIW, my impression is that relatively serious problems are still
being reported quite frequently, including crashes.

I also think we should figure out the more high-level problems I
brought up in the "bird-eye view" thread, because deployment
considerations do matter.

Thanks.