From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Line wrap reconsidered Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 18:00:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7w2vj0g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <92FF4412-04FB-4521-B6CE-52B08526E4E5@gmail.com> <878shfsq35.fsf@gnus.org> <6795D9A1-904E-4C6F-AE86-9EDD52718F01@gmail.com> <090B0FA5-2AA6-4134-BB8B-3FD9BFCC5AA0@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="87283"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuan Fu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 26 17:01:40 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdb5H-000MYi-OD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 17:01:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35104 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdb5G-0000R5-NA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdb4B-0007d1-2q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45621) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdb4A-0006xc-OM; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:00:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1051 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jdb49-0004TH-Na; Tue, 26 May 2020 11:00:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <090B0FA5-2AA6-4134-BB8B-3FD9BFCC5AA0@gmail.com> (message from Yuan Fu on Mon, 25 May 2020 23:30:36 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251453 Archived-At: > From: Yuan Fu > Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 23:30:36 -0400 > Cc: emacs-devel > > I had a look at category table. IIUC, a category table for all unicode characters would be impractically large and unnecessary. That conclusion is mistaken. Emacs char-tables are designed to handle memory very efficiently. In particular, if just a small number of characters have a non-nil property value, the memory consumption of such a char-table will be very low, and will grow and shrink as needed if additional values are modified from or to nil.