From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggest installing more fonts? Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 14:01:22 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7qljjel.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wnzqa1be.fsf@gnus.org> <83y2k6v378.fsf@gnu.org> <87eely5mof.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8l2utb5.fsf@gnu.org> <874kmt1icl.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8l1teo3.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuusklki.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuurr24j.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2k2fwgu.fsf@gnus.org> <83pn5ep8x0.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh4hi43l.fsf@gnus.org> <83eeltnf3b.fsf@gnu.org> <87sga7kg9s.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuunmy97.fsf@gnu.org> <87lffyijie.fsf@gnus.org> <87mu0eo434.fsf@gnus.org> <83tuuml74k.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2jxjulk.fsf@gnu.org> <87blgt4a7x.fsf@igel.home> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22434"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, larsi@gnus.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 13:04:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVusP-0005hO-0M for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:04:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVusO-0000Zt-0j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:04:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47522) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVupb-0007Nu-Ml for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:02:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVupV-0002ba-VA; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:01:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3100 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kVupF-000724-ER; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 07:01:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87blgt4a7x.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:28:50 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258343 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: rms@gnu.org, ghe@sdf.org, larsi@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 10:28:50 +0200 > > On Okt 23 2020, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Fonts support scripts, not languages. A font that supports the Latin > > script will normally support the diacriticals needed for Vietnamese. > > But they may not support the combining character for the NFD form. I > often see non-combined diacriticals in NFD text because the combining > character comes from a different font than the default one. Any specific examples? Does that happen with modern fonts with recent enough version?