From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Internationalize Emacs's messages (swahili) Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 11:24:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83h7o8ncly.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8ivumn5.fsf@telefonica.net> <87v9d3nkxk.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg7xrgr5.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7odrdwy.fsf@gnu.org> <86sg7w39fh.fsf@163.com> <83pn30pku5.fsf@gnu.org> <86wnx8otoj.fsf@163.com> <834kkbp9vr.fsf@gnu.org> <87czyxuxw6.fsf@db48x.net> <87y2hlt82w.fsf@db48x.net> <87lfdlvsw4.fsf@logand.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22175"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support, dimech@gmx.com, abrochard@gmx.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, db48x@db48x.net, all_but_last@163.com To: Tomas Hlavaty Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 26 10:26:03 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kt5pq-0005f4-H8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:26:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50156 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kt5pp-0006yQ-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 04:26:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kt5pI-0006Tb-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 04:25:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:58879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kt5pG-0000ha-GV; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 04:25:26 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2626 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kt5p2-0004ZJ-7U; Sat, 26 Dec 2020 04:25:14 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87lfdlvsw4.fsf@logand.com> (message from Tomas Hlavaty on Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:06:03 +0100) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261797 Archived-At: > From: Tomas Hlavaty > Cc: rms@gnu.org, bugs@gnu.support, dimech@gmx.com, > abrochard@gmx.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, > Zhu Zihao > Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2020 10:06:03 +0100 > > On Fri 25 Dec 2020 at 22:06, Daniel Brooks wrote: > > (let ((pl (> (length deleted) 1)) > > On a different note, there are 725 matches for "> (length" in Emacs. > Computing length first and then comparing the number of items is very > inefficient. What did you have in mind that would be more efficient? The above code sets 'pl' to a simple boolean based on whether 'deleted' has one member or more than one. What more efficient code would you suggest here?