From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages
 in the emacs tarball
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 13:50:43 +0200
Message-ID: <83h7n95gx8.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <86eeifawx8.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83a6t274ru.fsf@gnu.org>
 <86bldh9r4s.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="28037"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 22 12:53:18 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l2v09-00079w-PO
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 12:53:17 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58218 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1l2v08-0000JS-Mo
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 06:53:16 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39234)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1l2uxu-0007Ma-7y
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 06:50:59 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40821)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1l2uxt-0002UL-KG; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 06:50:57 -0500
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2866
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1l2uxg-00030C-Rt; Fri, 22 Jan 2021 06:50:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <86bldh9r4s.fsf@stephe-leake.org> (message from Stephen Leake on
 Fri, 22 Jan 2021 02:56:35 -0800)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263271
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/263271>

> From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 02:56:35 -0800
> 
> > We had this discussion in December, and I think at least some aspects
> > were agreed upon; one of them is that using Git submodules is probably
> > the best alternative.  Why don't we pick up where that discussion has
> > left off, instead of starting it all anew?
> 
> I did not realize that was a decision.

It wasn't.  But several people agreed and no one objected.  So I think
we have a consensus there.