From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 19:24:07 +0200 Message-ID: <83h7mt3w08.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87lfc5s9wg.fsf@gmail.com> <87y2g5xurt.fsf@igel.home> <87tuqtxtpw.fsf@igel.home> <83sg6d42o4.fsf@gnu.org> <1db01dbd-a1fd-7ea5-bf94-3462d0878e7f@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="24277"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, thibaut.verron@gmail.com, rpluim@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, dgutov@yandex.ru, drew.adams@oracle.com To: Yuan Fu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 18:30:17 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lyp-00069q-AC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 18:30:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55448 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lym-00053V-9A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:30:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lt6-00012a-Is for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lt5-0004Q9-Fh; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:24:19 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2159 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1l7Lst-0007cf-8P; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:24:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Yuan Fu on Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:12:46 -0500) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263817 Archived-At: > From: Yuan Fu > Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:12:46 -0500 > Cc: Dmitry Gutov , > Eli Zaretskii , > "thibaut.verron@gmail.com" , > "rms@gnu.org" , > "rpluim@gmail.com" , > "gregory@heytings.org" , > "emacs-devel@gnu.org" , > "ams@gnu.org" , > "schwab@linux-m68k.org" > > I just want to addd that considering the amount of work and discussion involved in removing or changing default key bindings, we shouldn’t go too lightly on adding them. I don't see any evidence that we are adding new key bindings too lightly.