From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Increase default `line-spacing' to 0.05, 0.10 or 0.15 [proposal]
Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 14:57:19 +0300
Message-ID: <83h7jgdqhs.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CADwFkmmFW1ZDGFYnZAETbPgub3_LVq9NckhX=sZExN8ueXX-_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <871ramlbpy.fsf@telefonica.net> <s6ruha$tn7$1@ciao.gmane.io>
 <87fsz1zmhv.fsf@gmail.com>
 <CADwFkmmqHkg9BZoy1Reu7-hct4-bXm5MLYRHcVe_AT4vH=CYNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sg30usa2.fsf@gmail.com> <83mtt8dvft.fsf@gnu.org>
 <87a6p8w0b7.fsf@gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="13856"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 06 14:12:29 2021
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lecrl-0003UH-3O
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 14:12:29 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47562 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lecrk-0003iU-61
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 08:12:28 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55284)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1lecdH-0003Hy-TD
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:57:31 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33622)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lecdH-0006qG-Jo; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:57:31 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1384
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lecdH-0003cB-7a; Thu, 06 May 2021 07:57:31 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87a6p8w0b7.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Augusto Stoffel on Thu, 
 06 May 2021 13:47:56 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel"
 <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268961
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/268961>

> From: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com>
> Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com,  jporterbugs@gmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 06 May 2021 13:47:56 +0200
> 
> Anyway, I think we can agree that setting `line-spacing' to nil is *not*
> analogous setting \baselineskip=0pt in TeX.

I'm TeX-illiterate.  Can you explain why these two aren't analogous?
It sounds like they are, when I read the definition of what
\baselineskip=0pt does.