From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 42596bd 2/6: Little improvements in rmail.el. Recognize encryped override headers. Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 18:59:34 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7j82ba1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210512030946.27770.7288@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20210512030948.6448F21128@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87a6p0kuxi.fsf@gnus.org> <8335us3xkh.fsf@gnu.org> <878s4khs2w.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13868"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, rms@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed May 12 18:04:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgrLg-0003Qd-1E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 18:04:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37724 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgrLe-0007mD-NJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 12:04:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgrGr-0000UU-9k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:59:40 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34584) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgrGq-0000AL-Ux; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:59:36 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1976 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgrGh-0006LM-1o; Wed, 12 May 2021 11:59:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878s4khs2w.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 12 May 2021 17:47:35 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269215 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 17:47:35 +0200 > > What if there's users out there that really want to see that [EXTERNAL] > thing, because their incoming MTA adds it, and it's corporate policy to > have those markings on mail that arrives from outside? Suddenly they > get a stern talking-to from HR. This is a misunderstanding: the code Richard added doesn't remove [EXTERNAL] from the Subject line shown to the user, it removes it when "simplifying" the Subject for the purposes of comparing it to other Subjects. IOW, it's an internal removal, not visible to the user. All the user sees is that Subjects "Foo" and "[EXTERNAL] Foo" compare equal, just like "Re: Foo" and "Antwort: Foo". Rmail has a command rmail-next-same-subject, which uses that.