From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode fontification feels random Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 22:32:51 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7idl924.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831r9iw473.fsf@gnu.org> <2d6d1cb0-2e8f-ceea-cb83-3bb840b65115@dancol.org> <83zgw6udxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87czt1zzns.fsf@gmail.com> <83pmx1la8s.fsf@gnu.org> <179d87db6a0.2816.cc5b3318d7e9908e2c46732289705cb0@dancol.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38843"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 04 21:34:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFa2-0009rD-Eo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 21:34:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47120 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFa1-0001cR-HB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFZ0-0000rb-6S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:33:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFYw-00057C-TD; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:32:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3202 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFYw-0004U6-Eg; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:32:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <179d87db6a0.2816.cc5b3318d7e9908e2c46732289705cb0@dancol.org> (message from Daniel Colascione on Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:26:28 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270404 Archived-At: > From: Daniel Colascione > CC: , > Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:26:28 -0700 > > >> I think it's a direct result of them being "modules" > > > > In the _real_ integration of those into Emacs, there's no reason for > > them to be modules. > > Eh. There's a benefit to keeping components loosely coupled That's an advantage, but we need to weigh it against the disadvantages. Maybe eventually we will decide it's worth making that a module, but my point is that it isn't a restriction we cannot lift.