From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode fontification feels random Date: Sat, 05 Jun 2021 15:27:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7icjy2y.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831r9iw473.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7ieyma7.fsf@gmail.com> <15be7dd8-e901-e317-5111-e1a34f6f0416@gmail.com> <83k0n9l9pv.fsf@gnu.org> <83eedhl83r.fsf@gnu.org> <838s3olsok.fsf@gnu.org> <87lf7oy7vn.fsf@gmail.com> <20210605095904.vnyrph5n4lqooeyh@Ergus> <83o8ckk0s4.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32134"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: jporterbugs@gmail.com, spacibba@aol.com, theo@thornhill.no, ubolonton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 05 14:28:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpVPU-00089N-BV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 14:28:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33542 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpVPT-0001b1-Cf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 08:28:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpVOw-0000lk-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 08:27:42 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpVOu-0003Qm-1g; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 08:27:40 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1950 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpVOt-0002m4-Jv; Sat, 05 Jun 2021 08:27:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Daniel Colascione on Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:55:21 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270432 Archived-At: > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, jporterbugs@gmail.com, ubolonton@gmail.com, > theo@thornhill.no, emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Daniel Colascione > Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 04:55:21 -0700 > > On 6/5/21 4:29 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 11:59:04 +0200 > >> From: Ergus > >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Jim Porter , > >> ubolonton@gmail.com, dancol@dancol.org, theo@thornhill.no, > >> emacs-devel@gnu.org > >> > >> Usually running a remote emacs is extremely slow if using gui and > >> creates all kind of issues if the connection fails or hang. > > > > And using Tramp with bad connections doesn't create any issues? > > Fewer than running a remote Emacs: you don't interact with Tramp on each > keystroke. There are tons of advantages to Tramp; it's a first-class > feature and it's worth making language server support work properly with it. No argument that we need to support that properly. This sub-thread started when someone said it would probably be slow with Tramp in the loop.