From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CSV parsing and other issues (Re: LC_NUMERIC) Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 05:35:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7i9f5ij.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20210606233638.v7b7rwbufay5ltn7@E15-2016.optimum.net> <83a6o1hn9l.fsf@gnu.org> <20210608004510.usj7rw2i6tmx6qnw@E15-2016.optimum.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35436"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: manikulin@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Boruch Baum Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 08 04:35:55 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lqRar-0008uP-Nf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2021 04:35:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqRaq-0006ay-M3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 22:35:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqRaI-0005U1-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 22:35:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44194) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqRaI-0006Qc-A0; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 22:35:18 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2379 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lqRaH-0000fE-TM; Mon, 07 Jun 2021 22:35:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210608004510.usj7rw2i6tmx6qnw@E15-2016.optimum.net> (message from Boruch Baum on Mon, 7 Jun 2021 20:45:10 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270551 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 20:45:10 -0400 > From: Boruch Baum > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, manikulin@gmail.com > > On 2021-06-07 15:28, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Sorry, I don't see the relevance. I was talking about calling > > functions, so how does some buffer enter this picture? Buffers don't > > have anything to do with the locale used by library functions called > > by Emacs. > > No? If an Emacs user has two buffers in two separate languages, the > buffer-local settings aren't / won't be respected? First, language is different from locale. And second, we don't even have a buffer-local notion of language yet. What we can support (but seldom if ever do) is to have buffer-local case-conversion table, which is a very small part of language- or locale-dependent settings. So no, buffer-local aspects in general don't affect what you have in mind, not yet anyway.