From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 11:45:33 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7fanej6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <835yvqoxu0.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuja7zt7.fsf@ypei.me> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26492"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: danflscr@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yuchen Pei Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 28 10:47:00 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtzP-0006dt-Lz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 10:46:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41798 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtzN-0001vm-Qt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:46:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtyP-0001F4-3R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:45:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtyO-0006lt-OS; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2254 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJtyE-0003Ox-8r; Sat, 28 Aug 2021 04:45:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tuja7zt7.fsf@ypei.me> (message from Yuchen Pei on Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:12:36 +1000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273256 Archived-At: > From: Yuchen Pei > Cc: rms@gnu.org, danflscr@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2021 18:12:36 +1000 > > >> notabug.org and sr.ht are considerably better, by our ethical > >> evaluation standards. > > > > Would someone please evaluate notabug.org wrt our expectations, > > and > > post a summary? TIA. > > There was already some evaluation: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00052.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-06/msg00036.html > https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Notabug Thanks, but that's not what I meant. I meant the evaluation wrt to the requirements the Emacs project has to such a platform. The same requirements we were discussing regarding GitLab and SourceHut.