From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native compilation on Windows, was Re: Bootstrap Compilation Speed Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 08:58:58 +0200 Message-ID: <83h79xpob1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h7a4zu89.fsf@gnu.org> <86czks94vl.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <86v8yj7vhv.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <83v8yjyj21.fsf@gnu.org> <87sftmn1k9.fsf@russet.org.uk> <83sftmwner.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtjump5q.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86h7a25nz7.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <878rve85yy.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86a6fu3xb2.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <87tue1j8x0.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86wniw3kdq.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <83tue0u8sh.fsf@gnu.org> <86sftk3evj.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <86k0ev3jvj.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <86bl07361o.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <8635li3mog.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> <86y23a10fy.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21156"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: corwin@bru.st, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "H. Dieter Wilhelm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 21 10:19:02 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nAq4T-0005G2-PP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:19:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAq4S-0007hO-Oo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 04:19:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAnsx-0000jz-3a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:58:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=34810 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAnsv-0005Gw-HA; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:58:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=JO/jKz+9bGBcLmNTdmAH/QF7m3+uBoNaZ/B4+St1uHQ=; b=eRT3uLumZX2M hKs9UCKxyJqFih1HEs3cREBMyf6pCqljGB9ysqEzbXELDoY2GP2D4gldX0bcOtQO4MnxSv/ZTr4eZ 3dCE2GnnxBBet9qc4wCMLhEHVYeoOwWd6infVjAsr3agWRxJ8jXAbq7wTSXSIBol2HV1fU7NczNQ4 XSf0xk4IFDr3R69MYbCeIIribJD6iVgQxr933PDAZbcQzBPpObkzLfXZd7gHYBPnHMLw23yU6hH4Z z62Ign4ex0Tq+0d67cRp/TpAcScC0UmTjpBMicg2dxAZdzGMKg1Z8MDazDj/UAeoVVPhDqH1mTNgm 5+5cFcLR899mLnpUj6Ht8A==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1672 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nAnsv-0000um-If; Fri, 21 Jan 2022 01:58:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86y23a10fy.fsf@duenenhof-wilhelm.de> (dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285092 Archived-At: > From: "H. Dieter Wilhelm" > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs developers , > Phillip Lord > Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 23:56:01 +0100 > > 3. The installer default is "c:\Program Files\Emacs" I think it would be > cleaner when the installation tree includes the version number. Why? The Emacs installation tree is designed to accommodate more than a single Emacs version simultaneously. Using versioned directories would mean users need to tweak their PATH each time they install a new version, which is undesirable and unnecessary. What are your reasons for using versioned installation trees?