From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Not able to display \u110BD and \u110CD in Emacs Date: Sat, 07 May 2022 10:01:03 +0300 Message-ID: <83h761zv0w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83bkwkbfn1.fsf@gnu.org> <837d78bct1.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgk49n9l.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8us9j6p.fsf@gnu.org> <83levnamv1.fsf@gnu.org> <837d779kgx.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28897"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Madhu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 07 09:05:07 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nnEUz-0007GN-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 09:05:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58692 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnEUy-0000NB-K5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 03:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51836) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnERI-0006bF-BW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 07 May 2022 03:01:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:34122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnERH-0005wB-MD; Sat, 07 May 2022 03:01:15 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=5ItEE4+vpGn4Ykn5r17cHD7N7MwlPbK3OMHM0+9N040=; b=jnEBFiYHhhCg D77QTqFGRWAf7mRE4LlZ0w8fg2bZw7Lgk+jhfkHdYu0MM+JLp2Wiza6lXT2hHstkhtBg4YEdgAX4x 742liODxq8T+eWgdBLaeH8rWvrWoXE8YnK/KsoABxssuS5oWQfcP8EJh4RpzW0iV0aP97eA/4TXF0 TUs2yZ09+qHYMaMVFdkjd1Y0nh394cQ5f0cR39lA58oTSjUeKWo2v2v1oVa2/bmkhlj6Jc+uGLZHi X/X4TI2FwSttFcC1prtfwJXr2CeUvPZDithcss7xogudK/5p9zGyITTYd99i3XSs6RF4UzqM+8XxM W9zvQGFsmcB/YDB8qXBHVQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3856 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nnERG-0003NR-S8; Sat, 07 May 2022 03:01:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Madhu on Thu, 05 May 2022 21:23:50 +0530) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289373 Archived-At: > From: Madhu > Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 21:23:50 +0530 > > The devanagari numerals 1 (#x967) & 3 (#x969) can be combined with > the svarita (#x951, incorrectly named in unicode as DEVANAGARI > STRESS SIGN UDATTA) and the anudatta (#x952) to form the 4 different > accents. > > numeral one + anudatta + svarita > preceding anudatta + numeral three + anudatta + svarita > numeral one + anudatta > numeral three + anudatta + svarita > > e.g. (#x969 #x951 #x952), when composed, the devanagari numeral 3 > should have an anudatta ("line below") and svarita ("vertical line > above") Where are these rules documented? I don't see them in the latest Unicode Standard 14.0.