From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Splitting image-dired.el into smaller files Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 18:18:15 +0300 Message-ID: <83h7249uiw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86ilmmm3r8.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38282"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: juri@linkov.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mathias.dahl@gmail.com To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 22 17:24:01 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQ9HU-0009ip-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 17:24:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54162 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQ9HR-0008PN-UP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:23:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51318) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQ9Bu-0001qU-D0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:18:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQ9Bt-0005fB-Cn; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:18:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=B+wmoRrq7HB8d6ZmggAhIwbC/mHLL/M7tKTgltTzogE=; b=OXxtpzmqPSLW Fv5jRL+vRKLkh9VzlcYsU5Jb+SS1rzmr2KZlYWe1J8er7ryBpAKvuivU2OIcZe2BME8lZiwjOri5w 9Sa0H8YBpzrhntTiReQHn8iDY8kgTESc25EEK25P89S6gcntqvF2XFn4xxDej7AUfPC+G4OZDLTaO ROI8jkR3sLS8Mx1hhDlKae+gOufkaPUPK0tesrHiMOQ00HkSJm7PfUyV3ewIdpl16JVd1K4NeWIpw 0xzlW1oToQx+peiww1lnyAKHQmmNL78LNAkxSVL5RCJGdSkcAksYuUQLc5Rr+Rlkv1EMrcy5DylTB hRJV2V2NXDtAe26RmUEQag==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4985 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQ9Bs-0004fi-RW; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 11:18:13 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Mon, 22 Aug 2022 06:08:24 -0700) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293811 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 06:08:24 -0700 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Mathias Dahl > > Juri Linkov writes: > > > Instead of the subdir 'image-dired/' I recommend to use 'image/' > > to have a common name for more image-related packages: > > I'm fine with putting this all under 'image/', but I don't think I have > any real opinion either way. ISTR that Eli was the first to suggest > putting this under 'image-dired/', so maybe he feels differently. I don't mind having those under image/, no. > idired is not a bad prefix, and it has some precedent in iimage.el. > OTOH, "image-dired" is not too bad either, and it is a bit more > descriptive. Agreed.