From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display of undisplayable characters: \U01F3A8 instead of diamond Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 12:34:53 +0300 Message-ID: <83h71ool6q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87edx28cl1.fsf@disroot.org> <83y1v7w6eu.fsf@gnu.org> <83a67iqo1k.fsf@gnu.org> <87k06m55mw.fsf@disroot.org> <2b564d99d3f609d1af75@heytings.org> <87zgfgvpru.fsf@dataswamp.org> <2b564d99d37a50be72cc@heytings.org> <878rn0vnf4.fsf@dataswamp.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="39092"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Emanuel Berg Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 03 11:37:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUPaJ-000A3I-Ms for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:37:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUPaI-0004Hr-Du for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 05:37:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38880) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUPYe-0003Kf-AU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 05:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54070) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUPYd-0003zE-LQ; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 05:35:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=XnOwfTAPEqxL/VdPy85G3ZgCjXnSESoxZTKuvFooC4E=; b=YLKKPlTn51nW ETMopn1DLh4T4VMaJSFgBUQqhAEX6qgkJOA24TEjLlRnyvsgTFfRiImgYcwxUG/zK5k+ePaxCLNFW gZXetpOGHKEv/zqdI8ei9j+G/fItmZ5PZjx0nmpnKe2hOoQEFXv/vCCY4D/Nju2DS+nXZUtwwvdwv Fw6mE7SlEdV24PTn4VjTH3ry4ld9gxyGNKgOHXN4sDHlW+R357xgpOO9S4FuSsBFGr2ULNmnLyBwV iepdNCtOU0U5pcYjpJO+T29lUG2XKWMoGRFoyGBIP+A/yyyjCxpCZlxQEB2k5NpMKlfX+0W0YOPjN ZhRsZPthsS59cIQPNWLKQg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2034 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUPYd-0001R8-99; Sat, 03 Sep 2022 05:35:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878rn0vnf4.fsf@dataswamp.org> (message from Emanuel Berg on Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:04:47 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294628 Archived-At: > From: Emanuel Berg > Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 11:04:47 +0200 > > Why can't we have an option what char should be used instead > of those bulky \U01F3A8 strings with the problems they bring > which have been mentioned? So if someone wants the old diamond > that can be arranged by a simple line of configuration? Of course, we have such an option with a simple configuration. Here: (set-char-table-range standard-display-table nil (vconcat (list (make-glyph-code #xFFFD 'homoglyph))))