From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Copyright assignment
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 08:27:06 +0200
Message-ID: <83h6kkou9x.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87lepa3pbi.fsf@disroot.org>
 <jwv1qr127cs.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkm=82z5BCX3z1bRA0uQrqR8_3Spw6GUVo6dFGWyk_nE60g@mail.gmail.com>
 <837d0twgx1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmndjLCH8sF1A94grYbQqciVX8okc3VDk0xTM2i8fBr7Tw@mail.gmail.com>
 <83msucpnf8.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CADwFkmnyQk2DpxpteGEhQAadSwh_0=_MgAf6rpchHLvKVzwyXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="476"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 15 07:28:07 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1rE1g6-000ASI-Qm
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 07:28:06 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1rE1fE-0003sd-Gg; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:27:12 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1rE1fC-0003sN-Dg
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:27:10 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1rE1fA-0002Mq-VX; Fri, 15 Dec 2023 01:27:09 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org;
 s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date:
 mime-version; bh=zfWP77TnlGj5HBY8I90DqdRb1y1+wFcxzmnBu0TRr+Y=; b=pvRZcqoE/d0q
 IVp900EXoqX/M2mntoClWzbx1SN6r54UN+xiI6NQY5tX/JDkWFwC9yxuO7fSWsH2sb6vmEgooFB6l
 +oqOc8wN+uTv2WpjLDUvIZ0YKWeKRgzS3nUIXVZV/pNfOFDh6bx2ON6klg9ayN1h49y9BvR/EUNor
 A+vgZ5ExdPm53hA1HBKyg058Dun8CyvWQkEWKBjxGR5h3aJWf4wE7X7bQSU4r3mCxIj0Fh0SDiyM6
 8O7XyKshnGfxYqhozOzDdXKqd6pGdDsoCjFJ9f91F88216YxFUY3gH/VVksZyKEYT6cNbOj5EzB6/
 ejfPyYZMHS8ED4xfSzrdgA==;
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkmnyQk2DpxpteGEhQAadSwh_0=_MgAf6rpchHLvKVzwyXQ@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Stefan Kangas on Thu, 14 Dec 2023 12:32:57 -0800)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:313842
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/313842>

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 12:32:57 -0800
> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> > Thanks, but what about the two issues I mentioned after the "but"
> > above?  How will we tackle them?  At least the first seems a real
> > problem to me.
> 
> I believe that I replied to that below the patch.  Can you find it?
> If not, I will resend it.

Maybe I'm confused or something, but I see nothing in your message
with the patch that follows the patch itself, not additional text.
What did I miss?