From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: No commit in vc? Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:35:13 +0200 Message-ID: <83fx5ni8dq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4B613BFB.2000107@swipnet.se> <87bpgev5bk.fsf@telefonica.net> <4B618AA4.1040403@swipnet.se> <87vdemtk4g.fsf@telefonica.net> <837hr23wrs.fsf@gnu.org> <87eilat62r.fsf@telefonica.net> <83eilat4g7.fsf@gnu.org> <873a1qt32z.fsf@telefonica.net> <83aavyt0bt.fsf@gnu.org> <201001290200.o0T200xh010567@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <83y6jhs2b6.fsf@gnu.org> <201001290940.o0T9e0br025585@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <87r5p9rxun.fsf@telefonica.net> <83vdelrx60.fsf@gnu.org> <201001291729.o0THTFam010863@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> <87ljfgdatj.fsf@telefonica.net> <83d40ssn0g.fsf@gnu.org> <201001301949.o0UJnBmA002547@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264887354 7751 80.91.229.12 (30 Jan 2010 21:35:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 21:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 30 22:35:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbKyl-0000PR-00 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 22:35:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39668 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbKyf-000404-0a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:35:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NbKyX-0003yg-Pd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:35:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54107 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NbKyX-0003yL-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:35:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbKyV-0004kF-VI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:35:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:43138) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbKyU-0004h7-IL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:35:27 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KX200M00X3PVX00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:35:12 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.180.161]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KX200LZQXAMCM60@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:35:11 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <201001301949.o0UJnBmA002547@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120726 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 11:49:11 -0800 (PST) > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Cc: =C3=93scar Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org >=20 > Eli Zaretskii writes: >=20 > It's still too terse. The goal is to explain what is going on to p= eople > that are not used to bzr, and will get confused by getting an error= on a > subsequent selective commit. I agree. > What's the reason not to have a very clear and unambiguous explanat= ion? > If it avoids reading help/ searching for clues, user will only be h= appy. >=20 > Here's a new version of this, just replace this function in vc-bzr.= el > Please feel free to improve the text. I'm fine with it, I would just replace before being able to check in anything else with before being able to check in any further changes because technically, "commit" and "check in" are synonyms.