From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: custom-reevaluate-setting / custom-initialize-delay Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:49:02 +0200 Message-ID: <83fx4rn5y9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <64d3zvx1zi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1266950961 2516 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2010 18:49:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: david.reitter@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 23 19:49:16 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Njzop-0002zu-SX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:49:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Njzop-0000R9-4Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:49:15 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Njzok-0000R4-Bp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:49:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55647 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Njzoi-0000Qw-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Njzoh-0002EJ-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:49:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Njzoh-0002E9-Fp; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:49:07 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KYB00H005K74F00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:49:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.246.192]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KYB00E7S5LOLVD0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:49:01 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <64d3zvx1zi.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121304 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 13:04:33 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > send-mail-function's default value probably shouldn't be based on > window-system anyway, now that X and tty frames can be mixed (though I > don't know if this works on Windows/Nextstep). I think > mailclient-send-it itself should check window-system and call > sendmail-send-it if it is nil. Could this be the reason for Bug#5299, per chance? Drew, does the problem in #5299 go away for you if you set send-mail-function to mailclient-send-it?