From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: on msdos Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:17:55 +0200 Message-ID: <83fwuo6zyk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mxp5b3mk.fsf@gnu.org> <83eiagbbvw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290773765 17421 80.91.229.12 (26 Nov 2010 12:16:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 26 13:16:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLxDc-0002VJ-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:16:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55324 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLxDb-0001Yd-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:15:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52803 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PLxDU-0001YY-Mw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:15:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLxDT-0004q2-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:15:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:36711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PLxDR-0004pH-TZ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 07:15:50 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LCH00D00R6QO800@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:15:48 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.63.39]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LCH00DJWREBCSD0@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:15:48 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133160 Archived-At: > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > From: Dan Nicolaescu > Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 23:40:39 -0500 > > > If you do want to remove HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H, then I guess it would be > > okay to remove the MSDOS conditions from the places that include > > sys/ioctl.h, and see if anything breaks. > > I can't test that, so it would be great if you could. I ran a few sanity checks and didn't see anything that broke as result of this change.