From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Annoying window/frame-configuration registers Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:14:57 +0200 Message-ID: <83fwq7ru1q.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301337180 16063 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2011 18:33:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 20:32:56 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4HFI-0006Ro-4L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:32:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4GzM-0007Rk-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37594 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4Gxw-0006p8-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Gxp-0005n5-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:14:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:34709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4Gxp-0005mY-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:14:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LIS00G0051M1Z00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:14:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.47.180]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LIS00E2H5COK551@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 20:14:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137789 Archived-At: > From: Leo > Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:51:43 +0800 > > I think the frame/window configuration registers are doing too much by > restoring point. Any objection to changing that behaviour? Thanks I'm quite sure there are use cases where point restoration is needed. However, a customizable option to do what you want is probably a good idea.