From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't use revision numbers on commit messages (and elsewhere). Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:15:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83fwq2p0xv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877hbfvwyo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87tyeivni1.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k4fevkc1.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83wrjepepy.fsf@gnu.org> <87d3l68988.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301663766 21043 80.91.229.12 (1 Apr 2011 13:16:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 01 15:16:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5eCo-00019q-Oi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 15:16:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5eCo-0008AK-0b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60471 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5eCi-00086v-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5eCh-0001Nq-9d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:48908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5eCe-0001MC-Vg; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 09:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LIZ00B005WAQ900@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:15:39 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.47.180]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LIZ00BI36622180@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:15:39 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87d3l68988.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137992 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:08:39 +0200 >=20 > Eli Zaretskii writes: >=20 > >> From: =D3scar Fuentes > >> Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 03:20:14 +0200 > >>=20 > >> Anyone can setup a public repo anytime, anywhere. Let's think of= a > >> long-lived feature branch of the type of lexbind or bidi > > > > The bidi branch was never alive for a long time. If anything, it= was > > _dead_ for a long time. Once serious work on bidi support was > > resumed, and it was in a shape that could be used without crashin= g > > every several seconds, it was merged with the trunk. >=20 > Not from the bidi branch IIRC. Exactly.