unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>,
	Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA>,
	Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:56:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83fwpnquhg.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4DA47581.9010509@cs.ucla.edu>

> Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:53:37 -0700
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> CC: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jim@meyering.net
> 
> If the code is well-defended against passing negative sizes,
> then we can remove the checks entirely; they're not needed.

My experience is that you can never be well defended against mixing
signed with unsigned.

Stefan and Chong, please voice your opinions about this.  I'm strongly
opposed to having the last argument of emacs_read and emacs_write be
of unsigned data type, but if you are okay with that, I'll get over
it.

> I'm sorry if there are hurt feelings about this, but size_t is
> clearly the better choice for buffer sizes; it's the universal
> standard in the C API.

Those hurt feeling would have been avoided if you waited until the
discussion is over and decision is made.



  reply	other threads:[~2011-04-12 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-04-11  8:55 oops? read/write vs type of length parameter Jim Meyering
2011-04-11  9:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 11:08   ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 11:28     ` David Kastrup
2011-04-11 11:52     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 12:27       ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-11 12:31         ` David Kastrup
2011-04-11 21:54           ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-12  4:44             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 13:24             ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-12 13:29               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 14:47                 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-12 17:00                   ` Large file support (was: oops? read/write vs type of length parameter) Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-14 20:57             ` oops? read/write vs type of length parameter Michael Welsh Duggan
2011-04-11 14:02         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-11 11:40   ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2011-04-11 13:58     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12  1:16       ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12  3:01         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12  5:06           ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12  5:46             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12  8:19             ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12  9:41               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 15:53                 ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 16:56                   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2011-04-12 23:55                   ` Juanma Barranquero
2011-04-13  5:14                   ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13  6:31                     ` Jim Meyering
2011-04-13  6:37                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13  8:15                       ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13  9:46                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 16:06                           ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 17:22                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 19:31                               ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13 19:59                               ` PJ Weisberg
2011-04-14  4:49                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 20:02                               ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-13  6:49                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-13 14:35                     ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 13:13                       ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15 16:34                         ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-15 18:20                           ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-04-15  1:29                   ` Stefan Monnier
2011-04-15  8:55                     ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-15  9:41                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-15 10:24                         ` Paul Eggert
2011-04-12 12:32             ` Davis Herring
2011-04-12 13:38               ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-04-12 15:43                 ` Paul Eggert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83fwpnquhg.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=cyd@stupidchicken.com \
    --cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).