From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Two strange messages while building Emacs on MS-Windows Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:37:47 +0200 Message-ID: <83fw3eas78.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83mwxpmtp6.fsf@gnu.org> <83fw3hm0nn.fsf@gnu.org> <83k3srdh3d.fsf@gnu.org> <878v97xfbi.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83boe3cb2e.fsf@gnu.org> <874njvxbrs.fsf@wanadoo.es> <837goqdgaw.fsf@gnu.org> <87zk1mx2ua.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83624acufq.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2yi17s5.fsf@wanadoo.es> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355150309 25439 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2012 14:38:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 10 15:38:42 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4V7-0005Ar-23 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 15:38:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54547 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Uu-0004y4-GI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:38:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41249) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4Uj-0004ww-DE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:38:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4UY-00045a-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:38:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:64680) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti4UX-00045J-T1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:37:58 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MET00300KJSCX00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:37:56 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MET002X5KN7OX80@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 16:37:56 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87d2yi17s5.fsf@wanadoo.es> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155428 Archived-At: > From: =D3scar Fuentes > Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:11:22 +0100 >=20 > time /c/apps/emacs/bin/emacs --batch --eval '(message "Hello")' >=20 > 0.047 s So what does this say about the efficiency of starting programs on Windows as compared to GNU/Linux?