From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On the subject of Git, Bazaar, and the future of Emacs development Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:50:11 +0300 Message-ID: <83fvz6f2bg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ehf1cwc4.fsf@maru.md5i.com> <20130331220136.GA16863@saturn> <83ip44iw3b.fsf@gnu.org> <83mwtef9f5.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365108593 6843 80.91.229.3 (4 Apr 2013 20:49:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 20:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 04 22:50:20 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UNr6y-0004MZ-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 22:50:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35980 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNr6Z-000802-BH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:49:55 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41435) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNr6O-0007p5-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:49:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNr6I-00081X-Ki for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:49:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:63263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNr6I-00080G-B9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:49:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MKR006000AYMM00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:49:34 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MKR006NI0ILDP80@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Thu, 04 Apr 2013 23:49:34 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158659 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 14:15:28 -0500 > > >>>>> joakim writes: > > > I think the debate could be made more constructive, if bzr upstream would > > show some life signs and accept the bzr-fastimport patches floating around, > > and other patches. Then people could use whatever local tooling they like. > > Yes, this really would be the best of all worlds. I care so much more about > the front-end experience than I do about how data is stored on the GNU > servers. I agree. Let's hope that Richard will succeed in finding a responsive maintainer to do that, and much more.