From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About the :distant-foreground face attribute Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:22:52 +0200 Message-ID: <83fvowdf4j.fsf@gnu.org> References: <35efc77e-e132-4700-ae0f-d95079293ff5@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389302620 25952 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2014 21:23:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 09 22:23:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W1N4r-0003LN-21 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 22:23:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54176 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1N4q-00052G-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:23:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1N4j-00051t-NX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:23:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1N4f-00033s-CP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:23:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:35671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W1N4Z-000313-L2; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:23:27 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZ500F00KLGN000@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:22:54 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZ500FCPKQ5BVA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 23:22:54 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <35efc77e-e132-4700-ae0f-d95079293ff5@default> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167981 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2014 13:12:59 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, cyd@gnu.org, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > Why do you assume that the previous form will not be accepted? Of > > course, it will be. > > Accepted by what? Are you thinking of `defface'? Why would you assume > that I assume that? What else can you possibly think of, when we are talking about defface? > That's not the point. It's about being accepted by, recognized by, and > useful for other, existing code. Other existing code should never see this. We are talking about defface, and defface alone. At least I was.