From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:40:53 +0200 Message-ID: <83fvdc51sq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppcj9740.fsf@gnu.org> <83k32r89rd.fsf@gnu.org> <83tx1t6dv6.fsf@gnu.org> <83y4r53reb.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416562897 29207 80.91.229.3 (21 Nov 2014 09:41:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 09:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 21 10:41:30 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XrkiX-00025O-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:41:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39587 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XrkiX-0003CC-C4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:41:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrki7-00033h-8G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:41:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrki1-0000gg-TK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:41:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:51657) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xrki1-0000dy-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:40:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NFD00K00UR4R000@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:38:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NFD00HI8URX8930@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 11:38:21 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177928 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:24:29 +0100 > > The solution you outlined ("just bind a variable") would not work for > the specific HTTPS problem that started the discussion, since url.el > works very asynchronously -- the actual code is run outside of the > dynamic extent of the binding. Sorry, I don't follow: doesn't the code run from a process filter? If not, what do you mean by "asynchronously" here?