From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Severe lossage from unread-command-events Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:35:40 +0300 Message-ID: <83fv3roxlf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87egjh4u1h.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83pp30sd5l.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2t831gf.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871tfgl0e2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87wpx8jigl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87pp2vf5f9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1439228173 1788 80.91.229.3 (10 Aug 2015 17:36:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 10 19:36:05 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqzV-0002MR-CF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:36:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59590 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqzU-00074Q-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:36:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53311) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqzR-00074J-1N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqzQ-0002ZQ-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:36:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout25.012.net.il ([80.179.55.181]:44635) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZOqzK-0002XY-Jk; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:35:54 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout25.012.net.il by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NSV00O00N9S3J00@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:32:04 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout25.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NSV00EJPNDG1V90@mtaout25.012.net.il>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:32:04 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87pp2vf5f9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:188695 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:56:42 +0200 > > David Kastrup writes: > > > Looks like I can (and must) leave off the (cons t ...) for my use > > case. I haven't seen any bad effects from doing so: events are looked > > up in keymaps and recorded just fine so far. I don't know what the > > implications of the t thing are. But other than that, things do look > > good so far. > > Any chance for this patch going in anytime soon? Anything I should be > doing here? I was waiting for you to tell whether it solves all the problems you know about with pushing events onto unread-command-events. If you are satisfied by what you see after applying the patch, I will push. Thanks.