From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ELPA policy Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:33:43 +0200 Message-ID: <83fv0gnxx4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <563ABD66.6070700@yandex.ru> <563AC64E.9060105@yandex.ru> <87twp0d2xp.fsf@md5i.com> <563B5E82.8070003@yandex.ru> <83mvuoo1pl.fsf@gnu.org> <8737wggulv.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447007647 1724 80.91.229.3 (8 Nov 2015 18:34:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2015 18:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 08 19:33:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvUmr-0004Bt-Fr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:33:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48466 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvUmq-0005gk-O8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:33:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41955) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvUmm-0005gd-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:33:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvUmh-00036j-HS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:50572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvUmh-00036f-8t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 13:33:47 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXI00000E24WP00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:33:46 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXI000TME8AUG10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 20:33:46 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <8737wggulv.fsf@gmail.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193638 Archived-At: > From: Artur Malabarba > Cc: John Wiegley , emacs-devel@gnu.org, > Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 19:27:08 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > My greatest fears are that packages that move from core to ELPA will > > get much less attention from the core maintenance team, which will > > eventually degrade their quality. > > We could bring the Elpa and Emacs repositories closer together somehow. > Maybe as a submodule or something like that. How about just using a single repository? ;-) Seriously, why should they be separate? Submodules still complicate things, compared to just having the stuff in the repo.