* checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc"
@ 2015-11-26 16:26 Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-28 20:45 ` John Wiegley
2015-12-11 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2015-11-26 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleh Krehel; +Cc: emacs-devel
The new variable checkdoc-package-keywords seems not to affect what
"M-x checkdoc" checks, only "M-x checkdoc-current-buffer" and commands
that call it. I think this is inconsistency is confusing. Can we
please extend the effect of that variable so that it covers 'checkdoc'
itself as well?
TIA
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc"
2015-11-26 16:26 checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc" Eli Zaretskii
@ 2015-11-28 20:45 ` John Wiegley
2015-12-11 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Wiegley @ 2015-11-28 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: Oleh Krehel, emacs-devel
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> The new variable checkdoc-package-keywords seems not to affect what "M-x
> checkdoc" checks, only "M-x checkdoc-current-buffer" and commands that call
> it. I think this is inconsistency is confusing. Can we please extend the
> effect of that variable so that it covers 'checkdoc' itself as well?
Sounds like a good request.
John
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc"
2015-11-26 16:26 checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc" Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-28 20:45 ` John Wiegley
@ 2015-12-11 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-12-12 23:12 ` John Wiegley
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2015-12-11 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ohwoeowho; +Cc: emacs-devel
Ping!
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 18:26:15 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> The new variable checkdoc-package-keywords seems not to affect what
> "M-x checkdoc" checks, only "M-x checkdoc-current-buffer" and commands
> that call it. I think this is inconsistency is confusing. Can we
> please extend the effect of that variable so that it covers 'checkdoc'
> itself as well?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc"
2015-12-11 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2015-12-12 23:12 ` John Wiegley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: John Wiegley @ 2015-12-12 23:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: ohwoeowho, emacs-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 548 bytes --]
>>>>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> The new variable checkdoc-package-keywords seems not to affect what
>> "M-x checkdoc" checks, only "M-x checkdoc-current-buffer" and commands
>> that call it. I think this is inconsistency is confusing. Can we
>> please extend the effect of that variable so that it covers 'checkdoc'
>> itself as well?
I'm in support of this change.
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 629 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-12 23:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-26 16:26 checkdoc-package-keywords and "M-x checkdoc" Eli Zaretskii
2015-11-28 20:45 ` John Wiegley
2015-12-11 8:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2015-12-12 23:12 ` John Wiegley
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).