From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: builds are getting slower? Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 05:31:27 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuz54sfk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8337vab7nx.fsf@gnu.org> <0d7fkmdxj1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <566D0BEB.4010707@cs.ucla.edu> <52wpsif21j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <6tpoy9aorv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450063903 29663 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2015 03:31:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 03:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 14 04:31:38 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a8JrK-00027H-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 04:31:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57602 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8JrJ-0006yx-Uf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:31:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60542) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8Jr8-0006yr-41 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8Jr3-0000fU-5Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:31:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a8Jr3-0000fQ-2L; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:31:17 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4124 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a8Jr2-00079G-3G; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:31:16 -0500 In-reply-to: <6tpoy9aorv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:53:56 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196232 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:53:56 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > So I just checked. Times as measured today: > > rev 536f6fc826b (Dec 13th): 24m23.556s > rev 95a5c23f741 (Dec 12th): 25m39.348s > rev b9acb9502fd (Nov 8th) : 21m33.631s > > So for me the effect is real and not due to a system change. Thanks. The next step, IMO, is to see which part of the bootstrap is 25% (or 4 min) slower. Is that the part that byte-compiles Lisp files, or is that some other part?