From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: builds are getting slower? Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:53:37 +0200 Message-ID: <83fuz21ov2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8337vab7nx.fsf@gnu.org> <0d7fkmdxj1.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <566D0BEB.4010707@cs.ucla.edu> <52wpsif21j.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <6tpoy9aorv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83fuz54sfk.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1u73cz8.fsf@gnu.org> <83lh8u1u71.fsf@gnu.org> <87egem5xuj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1450274028 5020 80.91.229.3 (16 Dec 2015 13:53:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 13:53:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, bruce.connor.am@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 16 14:53:42 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CWU-0008PC-20 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:53:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47501 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CWS-0001ky-W6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:53:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54070) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CWF-0001kg-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:53:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CWB-0004KO-QS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:53:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:37451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CWB-0004KK-N8; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:53:23 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4428 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a9CW8-00062g-2N; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:53:20 -0500 In-reply-to: <87egem5xuj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:25:56 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196371 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Glenn Morris , eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel > Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 14:25:56 +0100 > > >> And why exactly this code needs to run when we need to byte-compile > >> Lisp files, btw? > > > > I suspect it's because the byte-compiler is affected by local variables, so > > it needs to know them. > > Not really. It loads the files, and loading the files sets the > directory-local variables. I don't think it is a good idea to use them > for byte compilation even though I have to admit that a directory-wide > setting of `lexical-binding' would seem less ugly than putting it in > every file manually. But it sounds like a recipe for trouble. We can disable that.