From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dired: Improve symmetry in mark/unmark commands bound to keys Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 22:58:07 +0300 Message-ID: <83fuopax4g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877fa12iyq.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83h995ay04.fsf@gnu.org> <87y42h13pi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474747105 3670 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2016 19:58:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 19:58:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 21:58:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bnt5L-0007Qe-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:58:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35414 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnt5K-0001sr-7R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:58:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38392) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnt5E-0001sl-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:58:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnt5A-00010Q-RL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:58:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:42740) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnt5A-0000z0-No; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2231 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bnt56-0002qN-Sa; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:57:55 -0400 In-reply-to: <87y42h13pi.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:46:01 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207766 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: tino.calancha@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 21:46:01 +0200 > > >> There is no need for dired-mark-or-unmark-extension, > >> dired-mark-extension should to that already. Since the prefix argument > >> has always been useless it is ok to change its meaning, and make it > >> consistent with all other dired commands. > > > > I disagree and object to such a change. > > But is the only way that makes sense. You objection has no grounds. I stated my grounds. They might not make sense to you, but they do to me.