From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-25 ee04aed: Fix handling of buffer relocation in regex.c functions Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:35:39 +0300 Message-ID: <83funl4v5g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20161023191028.10942.12099@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20161023191028.C103F220124@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83mvhu5kn0.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1477325889 16931 195.159.176.226 (24 Oct 2016 16:18:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 16:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 18:18:05 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1byhwN-0000IL-FI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 18:17:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47870 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byhwP-0002K1-Pg for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 12:17:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byhHw-0003NQ-5n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:35:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byhHr-00064X-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:35:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50360) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1byhHr-00064N-EF; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:35:43 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2231 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1byhHq-0000XA-8s; Mon, 24 Oct 2016 11:35:42 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:18:59 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208697 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:18:59 -0400 > > > IMO it makes no sense to condition only this on REL_ALLOC, without > > conditioning all the rest. > > I didn't mean to condition only this. Yes, we should condition all code > that is specific to REL_ALLOC with "#if REL_ALLOC". I agree, and will do when the dust settles on this.